MayilVeera should not describe a product as compliant or certified solely because internal engineering tests passed. Safety-related functions require an appropriate safety lifecycle. Formal calibration requires suitable reference equipment, methods, traceability, and where claimed, accredited calibration facilities.
Checks whether the product satisfies the agreed functional and design requirements.
Evaluates selected characteristics before formal certification and helps identify issues that may need correction.
Must be performed according to the applicable standard and certification process, normally through an authorised or accredited external facility.
Some electrical and subsystem tests are possible, but complete functional verification normally requires controlled test firmware or the intended application firmware.
We can define a reproduction method, capture relevant signals and logs, compare good and failed conditions, and progressively isolate the fault. Intermittent issues may require extended testing or additional instrumentation.
No. Engineering testing, pre-compliance evaluation, and formal certification are separate activities.
Yes, subject to access to the hardware, documentation, firmware, test interfaces, and any required permissions.
Not necessarily. The number of units depends on the tests, expected variation, failure modes, destructive-test requirements, and confidence needed.
A production-test fixture and associated software can be scoped after the board's test points, programming method, production volume, test time, and acceptance criteria are understood.
Share the product requirements, schematic, board revision, firmware version, known symptoms, and tests already completed. We will help define the next verification steps.
Request a Testing DiscussionVisit or contact our Chennai team for industrial automation, embedded systems, product engineering, IIoT, and connected-device discussions.
